Food Establishment Inspection Report |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Page 1 of ????????? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
FOODBORNE ILLNESS RISK FACTORS AND PUBLIC HEALTH INTERVENTIONS |
Circle designated compliance status (IN, OUT, N/O, N/A) for each numbered item IN=in compliance OUT=not in compliance N/O=not observed N/A=not applicable Mark "X" in appropriate box for COS and/or R COS=corrected on-site during inspection R=repeat violation |
Risk factors are important practices or procedures identified as the most prevalent contributing factors of foodborne illness or injury. Public health interventions are control measures to prevent foodborne illness or injury. |
|
|
GOOD RETAIL PRACTICES |
Good Retail Practices are preventative measures to control the addition of pathogens, chemicals, and physical objects into foods. Mark "X" in appropriate box for COS and/or R COS=corrected on site during inspectionR=repeat violation |
|
|
IOCI 17-356
![]() |
Food Establishment Inspection Report |
|
Page 2 of ?????? | |
Establishments: PA-CHAN-GA | Establishment #: KK422 |
Water Supply: Public Private Waste Water System: Public Private |
Sanitizer Type: Chemical | PPM: | Heat: °F |
CFPM Verification (name, ID#, expiration date): | |||
TERRI WESTFALL K5CKB-IKCHKJF 08/03/2026 |
NOE SERNA 1615155 08/18/2027 |
RAMON DIAZ 1615140 08/18/2027 |
|
OBSERVATIONS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS |
Item Number |
Severity | Violations cited in this report must be corrected within the time frames below. |
Inspection Comments |
SPOKE TO NOE SERNA THE PERSON-IN-CHARGE (PIC) REGARDING THE COMPLAINT THAT WAS FILED WITH THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT REGARDING IMPROPERLY COOKED FOOD.
COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION WAS CONDUCTED ALONGSIDE THE FACILITY'S ROUTINE INSPECTION, WHICH MEANS A FULL INSPECTION OF THE FACILITY WAS CONDUCTED--(SEE CORRESPONDING REPORT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). AN EMPHASIS WAS PLACED ON THE FOOD ITEMS DESCRIBED IN THE COMPLAINT REPORT. I OBSERVED THE FACILITY'S FOOD HANDLING PROCESSES AND DID NOT OBSERVED ANY EMPLOYEE HYGIENE OR COOKING VIOLATIONS. THERE WERE ALSO NO VIOLATIONS RELATING TO FOOD HANDLING. IN ADDITION,, THERE WERE NO OBSERVABLE TEMPERATURE VIOLATIONS. HOWEVER, THERE WERE FOOD STORAGE VIOLATIONS. THESE VIOLATIONS WERE ADDRESSED ONSITE. FURTHERMORE, THE FACILITY HAS NOT EXPERIENCED ANY ISSUES RELATING TO EMPLOYEE ILLNESS. CURRENTLY, THE FACILITY DOES HAVE THE APPROPRIATE LANGUAGE RELATING TO EMPLOYEE ILLNESS REPORTING. THE RESULTS OF THE COMPLAINT INSPECTION IS INCONCLUSIVE. I COULD NOT DEFINITIVELY DETERMINE THAT THE ACTIONS TAKEN AT THIS FACILITY HAS CAUSED THE COMPLAINANT'S ADVERSE REACTION AFTER EATING AT THIS RESTAURANT. |
HACCP Topic: |
Person In ChargeNOE SERNA |
Date:02/07/2024 |
InspectorAlan Hatia |
Follow-up: Yes No Follow-up Date: |